Course description: Examination of appropriate methods in applied educational contexts. Consideration of analysis strategies for educational data, emphasis on identification and interpretation of findings.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| Syllabus_Sp06.pdf | 138.19 KB |
- interval/ratio data = normally distributed
- there are three methods to describe data
- three levels of measurement match the three methods of describing data to form a matrix
Statistics method/levels matrix:
| Central tendency | Variability | Graphics | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nominal (categories: male/female) | mode; "the most frequently occurring value was..." | what are the groups? what is the frequency of each category? | bar chart |
| Ordinal (rank) | median; could also use mode, but not mean | range; "the rankings range from one to 200" | histogram for range of big value pool; bar chart for frequency of small number values |
| Interval/ratio | mean; could also use mode and median but are not very likely to do so | standard deviation (measure of distance from the mean); variance (standard deviation squared) | histogram (is usually based as core/background of normal distribution curve) |
What is correlation?
How one changes with the other. ex: Pearson's correlation coefficient
Descriptive practice using NELS-88 data
standardize the following:
- In SPSS, click Analyze -> descriptive statistics -> frequencies -> move mother education to the right & move move comprehensive race to the right
- For mother ed and race, keep "Display frequency tables" checked. Select median and mode in the statistics button, and bar chart with frequencies in the charts button.
- For reading score, uncheck the "Display frequency tables" checkbox; in statistics button select mean, standard deviation, skewness, and kurtosis; and in charts button select histogram
* with continuous data like test scores, generating a frequency table or bar chart is a waste of time
** with continuous data like test scores, always generate skewness and kurtosis
Why dependent samples t test could be significant and independent t test not for the same numbers
Both use the formula t=mean difference/standard error, but the way standard error is calculated is different because in independent samples, you don't have the relationship of paired data you have in the independent test
sample writeups of SPSS results
asymptotic is for huge samples in Mann-Whitney results
r = multiple correlation coefficient
The correlation table and the regression's model summary table say the same confidence value (Pearson post versus r)
regression line formula: y = bX + a
don't forget to change the SPSS axis in graphics to start at zero to more accurately represent the data
Looking at assignment 2-3
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| EDF7403_Norman_A2-3_t-tests,etc.pdf | 224.45 KB |